The Toxic Impact of Homework

Dear Friends,

This week’s evidence is on one of my favorite subjects – the toxic impact of homework, especially on students from low-income families. The new article comes from a surprising source – Mike Petrelli of the Fordham Institute. Fordham is a well-known advocate for school choice, including vouchers and charters. Mike and his colleagues have been especially critical of my writing about the negative impact of zeroes on student motivation and success. But I must give him credit – he nailed the issue of homework. 

His article includes evidence that students from low-income families spend fewer hours on homework and are much less likely to have a quiet place to do schoolwork. In our own research in reducing student failures (shout-out to Dr. Pete Ondish), schools that move practice from home to class have significantly reduced failure rates, even though they have the same final exams, standards, and assessments. I’m sure that Mike will get a lot of grief from people who think that homework is a character-building experience. Still, we need to remember that this allegation is almost always from middle-class professionals with a college education – teachers and principals – who lament that kids today just are not as diligent as they were in the halcyon years of the past. It reminds me of the old musical, Bye Bye Birdie and the song “Kids.” The relevant lyric is: “Why can’t they be like we were, perfect in every way.” 

One more side note: I think we need to make an effort to engage with and find common ground with those with whom we normally disagree. So, props to Mike Petrelli for a fine piece of research. You can read the entire article here: Doing educational equity right: The homework gap.

I can be reached at 781-710-9633 or douglas.reeves@creativeleadership.net, if you want to discuss this week’s research.

Best,

Doug

Related Posts

  • Research Wednesday | March 4, 2026

    Do Audiobooks Count as Reading?
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    While surveys indicate that more than 40% of U.S. adults think that listening to a book should not be regarded as genuine reading, Brian Bannon, Chief Librarian of the New York Public Library, disagrees in a November 23, 2025, article.  He notes that while print circulation in the library has remained flat over the past five years, audiobook demand is up 65%.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 25, 2026

    Hope for Cynics
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this inspiring book (Hope for Cynics: The Surprising Science of Human Goodness, 2025) by Stanford’s Jamil Zaki, there is a treasure trove of research that will help all of us who support educators and school leaders who are dealing with despair in the dark winter months and pervasive threats to our schools, students, and professional careers. Professor Zaki marshals research and keen observation to make these essential arguments.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 18, 2026

    A Balanced and Skeptical View of AI in Schools
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this thoughtful and evidence-rich article (February 12, 2026), the authors cite several randomized control trials (RCT) that provide mixed evidence on the use of AI in schools. My recent book, Education and the Ethics of AI, offers practical ways to avoid cheating – the principal concern of teachers – and use AI in an ethical and constructive way.  This new article notes that when students become dependent on AI, their performance actually decreases, especially when they practice with AI but are later tested without AI assistance. Moreover, while AI can assist with simple tasks, such as learning multiplication tables, it does not enhance students’ reasoning or creative thinking.

    Read More