Social Sciences Under Attack

This week’s evidence discusses how the social sciences – including educational psychology, economics, political science, and many other fields students need – are under attack. This is not a new development, but the enthusiasm for diminishing scientific inquiry of all sorts has accelerated with the recent election results. The New York Times reports that Florida Universities have slashed core courses that contain “unproven theories because they might include “woke” indoctrination. Gender and ethnic studies and sociology are under special scrutiny, along with inter-cultural studies. At Florida International University, 22 courses have been eliminated, and more than two dozen others have been revised to avoid state restrictions. This reminds me of my star student in China, who anchored the evening news and claimed that “we have no censorship in China.” She responded to my incredulity with the statement, “We do not need censorship in China – we censor ourselves.” So, it is today in the land of free speech.

 The long game is clear – when classes lack enrollment, university administrators have the ready excuse to cut courses and departments entirely. Particularly offensive are the policies that demand that courses “not make students uncomfortable.” Ironically, this is precisely what university leftist professors have done with trigger warnings and other efforts to avoid student discomfort. Indoctrination and censorship are dangerous, whether from the left or right. It robs students of the essence of education – the ability to think critically and challenge prevailing orthodoxy. Just ask Galileo. Here’s the link:  https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/21/us/florida-social-sciences-progressive-ideas.html

Related Posts

  • Research Wednesday | March 4, 2026

    Do Audiobooks Count as Reading?
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    While surveys indicate that more than 40% of U.S. adults think that listening to a book should not be regarded as genuine reading, Brian Bannon, Chief Librarian of the New York Public Library, disagrees in a November 23, 2025, article.  He notes that while print circulation in the library has remained flat over the past five years, audiobook demand is up 65%.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 25, 2026

    Hope for Cynics
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this inspiring book (Hope for Cynics: The Surprising Science of Human Goodness, 2025) by Stanford’s Jamil Zaki, there is a treasure trove of research that will help all of us who support educators and school leaders who are dealing with despair in the dark winter months and pervasive threats to our schools, students, and professional careers. Professor Zaki marshals research and keen observation to make these essential arguments.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 18, 2026

    A Balanced and Skeptical View of AI in Schools
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this thoughtful and evidence-rich article (February 12, 2026), the authors cite several randomized control trials (RCT) that provide mixed evidence on the use of AI in schools. My recent book, Education and the Ethics of AI, offers practical ways to avoid cheating – the principal concern of teachers – and use AI in an ethical and constructive way.  This new article notes that when students become dependent on AI, their performance actually decreases, especially when they practice with AI but are later tested without AI assistance. Moreover, while AI can assist with simple tasks, such as learning multiplication tables, it does not enhance students’ reasoning or creative thinking.

    Read More