Fearless Leadership

Here is a quick excerpt from my new book, Fearless Leadership, that might be useful in your discussions with school and district leaders. It has to do with how leaders and governing board members can deal with public participation in board meetings:

We follow the principle to first seek to understand, and then seek to be understood. We believe all constituents deserve both a vote and a listening ear. We also believe all constituents deserve to be safe from threats by those who disagree. We welcome vigorous yet respectful debate, and the rules of civil discourse will be enforced as we do so.

  1. The purpose of public comments during governing board meetings is to allow citizens of the district to share their ideas and for the board and district leadership to learn from those citizens. We welcome different opinions, vigorously argued, provided that the expressions of those opinions fall within the boundaries of civil discourse as outlined in this policy.

  2. Speakers at governing board meetings must be district residents and provide proof of residency when they submit their names for recognition during the public comment period.

  3. Speakers must address an educational issue directly relevant to this school system. General political speeches not related to education are not relevant to the decisions of the governing board.

  4. Speakers may not make any threats, explicit or implied, to any staff member or board member either inside or outside the meeting, either directly or indirectly, or either in person or via any electronic means, such as social media.

  5. By signing into the application to speak at public meetings, the applicant agrees to abide by these policies and agrees to be ejected from the meeting if the applicant fails to abide by these policies.

Here is a link to a timely read from Forbes – https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescoachescouncil/2025/04/11/leading-learning-lucky-and-losing-a-framework-for-business-and-education-leadership/

Related Posts

  • Research Wednesday | March 4, 2026

    Do Audiobooks Count as Reading?
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    While surveys indicate that more than 40% of U.S. adults think that listening to a book should not be regarded as genuine reading, Brian Bannon, Chief Librarian of the New York Public Library, disagrees in a November 23, 2025, article.  He notes that while print circulation in the library has remained flat over the past five years, audiobook demand is up 65%.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 25, 2026

    Hope for Cynics
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this inspiring book (Hope for Cynics: The Surprising Science of Human Goodness, 2025) by Stanford’s Jamil Zaki, there is a treasure trove of research that will help all of us who support educators and school leaders who are dealing with despair in the dark winter months and pervasive threats to our schools, students, and professional careers. Professor Zaki marshals research and keen observation to make these essential arguments.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 18, 2026

    A Balanced and Skeptical View of AI in Schools
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this thoughtful and evidence-rich article (February 12, 2026), the authors cite several randomized control trials (RCT) that provide mixed evidence on the use of AI in schools. My recent book, Education and the Ethics of AI, offers practical ways to avoid cheating – the principal concern of teachers – and use AI in an ethical and constructive way.  This new article notes that when students become dependent on AI, their performance actually decreases, especially when they practice with AI but are later tested without AI assistance. Moreover, while AI can assist with simple tasks, such as learning multiplication tables, it does not enhance students’ reasoning or creative thinking.

    Read More