Why Standards?

By Tony Flach

April 12, 2020

 

This is truly an unprecedented time in American educational history. I have been honored to continue relationships with schools across the country, albeit remotely, and am humbled by their leaders’ and faculties’ dedication to making this time as normal and productive as possible for their students. I am hearing of heroic efforts to purchase and deploy laptops and mobile internet hotspots, duplicate materials for those families who do not have internet access, and provide prepared meals for our neediest families. Educators are doing their best to make changes while district and state leadership is doing their best to provide guidance. However, I also hear stress and uncertainty in the voices of many of our partners as they try to figure out how to make an overnight transition to remote learning. Many are asking how they should respond.

Most importantly, we need to understand that we can’t do everything. And, in the words of Ken Untener (but usually attributed to Archbishop Oscar Romero), there is a sense of liberation in realizing that. He also writes that “this allows us to do something, and to do it very well” (2007). I encourage you to reflect on your current situation and pick the one thing that, if you did it well, would allow you to do more next week to serve your students and your community.

For some districts, doing one thing right now means prioritizing their curriculum to identify the absolute safety net of priority standards. More than 20 years ago, Doug Reeves and Larry Ainsworth wrote about the importance of prioritizing standards to identify what they called a “safety net curriculum” that would be the absolute minimum that all students need to master. One school district with whom we work has done this and is directing their teachers to focus on only those standards for their instruction and assessment. They are doing this out of a recognition of the need to avoid overwhelming staff and students with a sudden switch to delivering every piece of instruction remotely.

For others, doing one thing right means engaging staff within buildings in cross-training each other in the ed tech tools they each use to build a minimum level of capacity to deliver instruction electronically. Coaches in one building realized that their staff was using a variety of tools to deliver instruction and that students in the same grade with multiple teachers were having to learn multiple systems. The leadership team decided to focus on getting every teacher in the building proficient at using Google Classroom to manage assignments this week. Next week, they will focus on using a web-based video platform to record mini-lessons for students. Their approach is thoughtful, logical, and a recognition that they cannot build the capacity of all teachers to use all tools well immediately.

What is the one thing that you need to do this week in order to be in a better position to serve your community next week?

 

References

Ainsworth, L. (2003). Power standards: Identifying the standards that matter the most. Englewood, CO: Advanced Learning Press.

Untener, K. (2007). The practical prophet: Pastoral writings. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.

Subscribe to receive our blog updates

Related Posts

  • Research Wednesday | March 4, 2026

    Do Audiobooks Count as Reading?
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    While surveys indicate that more than 40% of U.S. adults think that listening to a book should not be regarded as genuine reading, Brian Bannon, Chief Librarian of the New York Public Library, disagrees in a November 23, 2025, article.  He notes that while print circulation in the library has remained flat over the past five years, audiobook demand is up 65%.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 25, 2026

    Hope for Cynics
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this inspiring book (Hope for Cynics: The Surprising Science of Human Goodness, 2025) by Stanford’s Jamil Zaki, there is a treasure trove of research that will help all of us who support educators and school leaders who are dealing with despair in the dark winter months and pervasive threats to our schools, students, and professional careers. Professor Zaki marshals research and keen observation to make these essential arguments.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 18, 2026

    A Balanced and Skeptical View of AI in Schools
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this thoughtful and evidence-rich article (February 12, 2026), the authors cite several randomized control trials (RCT) that provide mixed evidence on the use of AI in schools. My recent book, Education and the Ethics of AI, offers practical ways to avoid cheating – the principal concern of teachers – and use AI in an ethical and constructive way.  This new article notes that when students become dependent on AI, their performance actually decreases, especially when they practice with AI but are later tested without AI assistance. Moreover, while AI can assist with simple tasks, such as learning multiplication tables, it does not enhance students’ reasoning or creative thinking.

    Read More