Why Standards?

By Tony Flach

April 12, 2020

 

This is truly an unprecedented time in American educational history. I have been honored to continue relationships with schools across the country, albeit remotely, and am humbled by their leaders’ and faculties’ dedication to making this time as normal and productive as possible for their students. I am hearing of heroic efforts to purchase and deploy laptops and mobile internet hotspots, duplicate materials for those families who do not have internet access, and provide prepared meals for our neediest families. Educators are doing their best to make changes while district and state leadership is doing their best to provide guidance. However, I also hear stress and uncertainty in the voices of many of our partners as they try to figure out how to make an overnight transition to remote learning. Many are asking how they should respond.

Most importantly, we need to understand that we can’t do everything. And, in the words of Ken Untener (but usually attributed to Archbishop Oscar Romero), there is a sense of liberation in realizing that. He also writes that “this allows us to do something, and to do it very well” (2007). I encourage you to reflect on your current situation and pick the one thing that, if you did it well, would allow you to do more next week to serve your students and your community.

For some districts, doing one thing right now means prioritizing their curriculum to identify the absolute safety net of priority standards. More than 20 years ago, Doug Reeves and Larry Ainsworth wrote about the importance of prioritizing standards to identify what they called a “safety net curriculum” that would be the absolute minimum that all students need to master. One school district with whom we work has done this and is directing their teachers to focus on only those standards for their instruction and assessment. They are doing this out of a recognition of the need to avoid overwhelming staff and students with a sudden switch to delivering every piece of instruction remotely.

For others, doing one thing right means engaging staff within buildings in cross-training each other in the ed tech tools they each use to build a minimum level of capacity to deliver instruction electronically. Coaches in one building realized that their staff was using a variety of tools to deliver instruction and that students in the same grade with multiple teachers were having to learn multiple systems. The leadership team decided to focus on getting every teacher in the building proficient at using Google Classroom to manage assignments this week. Next week, they will focus on using a web-based video platform to record mini-lessons for students. Their approach is thoughtful, logical, and a recognition that they cannot build the capacity of all teachers to use all tools well immediately.

What is the one thing that you need to do this week in order to be in a better position to serve your community next week?

 

References

Ainsworth, L. (2003). Power standards: Identifying the standards that matter the most. Englewood, CO: Advanced Learning Press.

Untener, K. (2007). The practical prophet: Pastoral writings. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.

Subscribe to receive our blog updates

Related Posts

  • Research Wednesday | April 15, 2026

    From PLC Meetings to Instructional Reliability
    Contributing author: Dr. Gregory VanHorn

    This article argues that the persistent struggle of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) and Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) is not a lack of belief, effort, or expertise among educators, but a problem of operating-model design. Drawing carefully from high-reliability organizations—specifically GE Aerospace’s FLIGHT DECK operating model—the author reframes PLCs not as meetings or initiatives, but as Tier 1 instructional engines that must reliably produce improvement through disciplined collaboration and follow-through.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | April 8, 2026

    Uncomplicated Grading Reform
    Contributing author: Dr. Emily Freeland

    It is not surprising that in schools and districts, significant grading reform efforts often stall. Not because educators disagree with the need to reconsider current practices, but because the work becomes burdensome and overly complicated. Issues and disagreements arise when monitoring checklists multiply in length; reporting systems grow more complex, and fairness and accuracy give way to compliance.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | March 11, 2026

    The Key to Secondary School Success: Getting 9th Grade Right
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    Kaaron Andrews has studied the relationship between 9th-grade student performance, graduation, and subsequent post-secondary success.  She is the Director of the Center for High School Success. When they increase on-track 9th-grade rates, they are 3-4 times more likely to graduate from high school. It is the single strongest predictor of high school success – more than race, socioeconomic status, or even 8th-grade test scores. She contends that high schools are programmed for disconnection – disconnected from their peer group and from teachers who often have 150 students with whom they struggle to have a relationship.

    Read More