Student Engagement

Student engagement is a hot topic with many teachers despairing that students display an alarming degree of disinterest and disengagement in school. More than 130 studies in this meta-analysis revealed that engagement and academic achievement are very related. The Student, published in the Journal of Educational Psychology https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fedu0000833 was published in 2024.  

 

Key findings included that engagement is a powerful variable related to participation, effort, and achievement. The authors noted that the term “engagement” is often poorly defined and too vague to help teachers draw practical conclusions from the research. Nevertheless, we certainly know what disengagement looks like – teachers who elevate coverage of material over frequent checks for understanding while grouping two or three students processing critical information. Nevertheless, many teachers get the message that delivery is equivalent to learning, and that failure to stick to the script and cover the curriculum can lead to administrators blaming teachers for failing to cover all the standards. In a recent article in Kappan, my friends and occasional co-authors, Doug Fisher and Nancy Frey, insisted that teachers must cover every standard and argued against prioritized standards – the term I coined more than 30 years ago was Power Standards™. The fatal flaw in every state standard is the assumption that students need only one year of learning and thus, teachers should deliver one year of standards. That assumption was invalid before the learning losses associated with COVID and is preposterous now. The situation will worsen if we encourage teachers to engage in mind-numbing lectures and demonstrate ions at the expense of student engagement. Great teachers use three-minute timers – three minutes to explain a single concept, three minutes to present a challenge that students work on either alone or with a partner, and then three minutes to have students explain their answers. This can transform a deadly dull class period into a vibrant and engaging learning experience. 

I encourage you to listen to the Fearless Schools Podcast. Tomorrow, a new episode drops. It is “From Pandemic Student to Post Pandemic Teacher” and features Em Beeler and Kylie Thomas. Follow the Fearless Schools Podcast wherever you listen.

Apple Podcasts Spotify iHeart Podcasts

Related Posts

  • Research Wednesday | March 4, 2026

    Do Audiobooks Count as Reading?
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    While surveys indicate that more than 40% of U.S. adults think that listening to a book should not be regarded as genuine reading, Brian Bannon, Chief Librarian of the New York Public Library, disagrees in a November 23, 2025, article.  He notes that while print circulation in the library has remained flat over the past five years, audiobook demand is up 65%.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 25, 2026

    Hope for Cynics
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this inspiring book (Hope for Cynics: The Surprising Science of Human Goodness, 2025) by Stanford’s Jamil Zaki, there is a treasure trove of research that will help all of us who support educators and school leaders who are dealing with despair in the dark winter months and pervasive threats to our schools, students, and professional careers. Professor Zaki marshals research and keen observation to make these essential arguments.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 18, 2026

    A Balanced and Skeptical View of AI in Schools
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this thoughtful and evidence-rich article (February 12, 2026), the authors cite several randomized control trials (RCT) that provide mixed evidence on the use of AI in schools. My recent book, Education and the Ethics of AI, offers practical ways to avoid cheating – the principal concern of teachers – and use AI in an ethical and constructive way.  This new article notes that when students become dependent on AI, their performance actually decreases, especially when they practice with AI but are later tested without AI assistance. Moreover, while AI can assist with simple tasks, such as learning multiplication tables, it does not enhance students’ reasoning or creative thinking.

    Read More