Rhetoric and Reality for College and Career Readiness

When students walk across the stage for their high school graduation, they will hear the refrain that they are “college and career ready.” But as Johns Hopkins University researcher Robert Slavin reports, the reality is strikingly different.

First, a high school diploma does not qualify students for a job that has potential for a middle-class life. Although not every student needs a four-year degree, they all need some sort of job qualification, certification, or other program that gives them the skills necessary to enter the work force.

Second, high school is not preparing students for college or technical school. To even qualify for those classes, these high school graduates must pass tests in basic literacy and mathematics, tests many high school graduates fail. State and federal governments have focused on high school graduation rates, but not on skills and qualifications associated with college and career readiness. The Center for American Progress reported that up to 60 percent of high school graduates require remedial classes before they can start taking credit-earning courses in college or technical school.

Third, high school curricula, especially in schools with high concentrations of low-income students, are increasingly fragmented. It is not unusual to find the day divided into seven, eight, or even nine classes, all in the name of giving students more choice. But the practical impact is that teachers have fewer minutes of every day — sometimes less than 45 minutes per period — to help students learn the same curriculum that used to be covered in an hour per day. That loss of 15 minutes per day over 180 days of the school year amounts to 45 fewer instructional hours per year. It is interesting that in the world’s leading schools, including elite international and independent schools, students typically have only five classes – six at the most. They have fewer choices now in order to get more choices for a lifetime, while low-income students are given more choices now, resulting in fewer choices for a lifetime.

Fourth, 12th grade is often a wasteland, with students attending school for only half the day or less, because they have already accumulated enough credits to graduate. They attend the prom and homecoming, walk across the stage at graduation, but miss a crucial opportunity to gain the skills that might have helped them avoid remedial classes in college and technical school.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Some innovative programs are rethinking 12th grade, as Slavin documents in his excellent report. Other schools are adding additional academic requirements, especially in expository writing – a key skill for college or the world of work. Sure, we can celebrate high school graduation, but let’s be honest about the difference between the rhetoric of college and career readiness and the reality that our new graduates must face.

Subscribe to receive our blog updates

Related Posts

  • Research Wednesday | March 4, 2026

    Do Audiobooks Count as Reading?
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    While surveys indicate that more than 40% of U.S. adults think that listening to a book should not be regarded as genuine reading, Brian Bannon, Chief Librarian of the New York Public Library, disagrees in a November 23, 2025, article.  He notes that while print circulation in the library has remained flat over the past five years, audiobook demand is up 65%.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 25, 2026

    Hope for Cynics
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this inspiring book (Hope for Cynics: The Surprising Science of Human Goodness, 2025) by Stanford’s Jamil Zaki, there is a treasure trove of research that will help all of us who support educators and school leaders who are dealing with despair in the dark winter months and pervasive threats to our schools, students, and professional careers. Professor Zaki marshals research and keen observation to make these essential arguments.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 18, 2026

    A Balanced and Skeptical View of AI in Schools
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this thoughtful and evidence-rich article (February 12, 2026), the authors cite several randomized control trials (RCT) that provide mixed evidence on the use of AI in schools. My recent book, Education and the Ethics of AI, offers practical ways to avoid cheating – the principal concern of teachers – and use AI in an ethical and constructive way.  This new article notes that when students become dependent on AI, their performance actually decreases, especially when they practice with AI but are later tested without AI assistance. Moreover, while AI can assist with simple tasks, such as learning multiplication tables, it does not enhance students’ reasoning or creative thinking.

    Read More