Research Wednesday | January 7, 2026

Evidence on the Impact of Coaching

I have learned to be skeptical of television personalities who claim expertise in nearly any field.  That is the prejudice with which I approached the work of Dr. Brene Brown, but I was pleasantly surprised to see how deep the research base on which she bases her conclusions.  Her latest book, Strong Ground (2025), features data from over 16,000 participants in coaching, which should be of interest to our coaches and coaching clients.  

Turnover rates were reduced by more than 50%.  

41% of participants reported boosts in productivity and energy.  

86% reported an increase in management effectiveness.  

14% reported an increase in leadership development.

One of the key factors that distinguishes coaching from Creative Leadership Solutions is that we are rigorously accountable for our results, with reports to building and district leaders after every coaching meeting.  I would like to include a couple of parenthetical notes with this report.  First, “coaching” has a very ambiguous definition in many quarters, which has led many senior leaders to be skeptical.  See our book “Fearless Coaching” for greater precision in the use of this term.  We sometimes use the phrase “collaborative team support” instead of “coach” if the term “coach” might alienate potential clients.  Finally, we need to have an exceedingly clear definition of what coaching is and what it is not.  The book Fearless Coaching does a nice job of drawing this distinction clearly.

https://www.creativeleadership.net/fearless-books

Related Posts

  • Using Text Annotation to Support the Writing Process

    April 29, 2026
    Contributing author: Dr. Marisa Rivas

    Read More
  • Is It Really Alternative—or Just a Different Address?

    In my work supporting alternative schools and programs, I’ve found that too often continuation and alternative settings inherit the same graduation requirements, schedules, grading systems, instructional routines, and pacing that failed students the first time. They are simply in a smaller setting and frequently with even fewer resources. In many cases, rigid credit requirements minimize flexibility for students and instead condemn them to hours of tedious, computer-based credit recovery.

    Read More
  • A Team of One: Rethinking Singletons in Collaborative Learning Teams

    It’s one of the most common, and most limiting, statements we hear when it comes to PLCs, or what we call Collaborative Learning Teams (CLTs). Whether it’s a lone 5th grade teacher, a single PE teacher, a music teacher, the only Chemistry teacher, a specialist, or someone teaching across multiple grade levels, the conclusion is often the same: there’s no one to collaborate with. And just like that, the work stops, not because it can’t happen, but because we’ve defined collaboration too narrowly.

    Read More