Professional Development

I have attempted to separate these updates from politics, but this week’s news went over the line. The Administration is asking the Supreme Court to approve the Administration’s decision to cancel professional development for teachers that has already been approved by Congress. We have all seen lousy professional development programs, and it is easy to cherry-pick those that are ineffective and without a research foundation. But canceling all of them because some are bad is like canceling all cancer treatments because some do not work. A better approach is to consider criteria that Professor Tom Guskey and I have advocated for: professional development that is explicitly linked to improvements in student achievement. These criteria are neither political nor “DEI” related, but rational ways to have effective stewardship of public funds. I do not want any of our colleagues to be put on the defensive about bad professional development programs. I do, however, want us to staunchly defend effective PD that improves teaching and learning. 

You can read more about this argument here:  https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/26/us/politics/trump-supreme-court-teacher-grants.html

Related Posts

  • Research Wednesday | April 15, 2026

    From PLC Meetings to Instructional Reliability
    Contributing author: Dr. Gregory VanHorn

    This article argues that the persistent struggle of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) and Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) is not a lack of belief, effort, or expertise among educators, but a problem of operating-model design. Drawing carefully from high-reliability organizations—specifically GE Aerospace’s FLIGHT DECK operating model—the author reframes PLCs not as meetings or initiatives, but as Tier 1 instructional engines that must reliably produce improvement through disciplined collaboration and follow-through.

    Read More

  • Research Wednesday | April 8, 2026

    Uncomplicated Grading Reform
    Contributing author: Dr. Emily Freeland

    It is not surprising that in schools and districts, significant grading reform efforts often stall. Not because educators disagree with the need to reconsider current practices, but because the work becomes burdensome and overly complicated. Issues and disagreements arise when monitoring checklists multiply in length; reporting systems grow more complex, and fairness and accuracy give way to compliance.

    Read More

  • Research Wednesday | March 11, 2026

    The Key to Secondary School Success: Getting 9th Grade Right
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    Kaaron Andrews has studied the relationship between 9th-grade student performance, graduation, and subsequent post-secondary success.  She is the Director of the Center for High School Success. When they increase on-track 9th-grade rates, they are 3-4 times more likely to graduate from high school. It is the single strongest predictor of high school success – more than race, socioeconomic status, or even 8th-grade test scores. She contends that high schools are programmed for disconnection – disconnected from their peer group and from teachers who often have 150 students with whom they struggle to have a relationship.

    Read More