Do You Want to Dig a Ditch or Build a Bridge? Your Grading System Will Answer The Question

November 29, 2016

I recently received a question from a teacher who was concerned that her colleagues, opposed to changes in grading systems, insisted that in the real world, it was essential to get things right the first time.  Therefore, her colleagues claimed, the average, along with draconian punishments for failures, were appropriate grading policies.  

But the “real world” of the 18th century is not where we are preparing students to succeed. Today’s real world requires feedback, acceptance of that feedback, followed by improved performance.  Think of it this way.  The nation is about to spend a trillion dollars on infrastructure improvement.  If you want to use a shovel, you’re fine just as you are – get it right the first time.  If you want to use a machine, like a post-hole digger, be prepared for some feedback and adjustments.  If you want to operate a more complex machine, like an asphalt layer, then be prepared for a lot more feedback and more complex equations before you make the wrong move. If you want to be a surveyor, engineer, or the architect of a bridge, then you’d better be prepared to accept lots and lots of feedback and never, ever, think that you’ll get it right the first time. 

So that’s the real world of the 21st Century.  If you think the real world is “getting it right the first time,” then grab a shovel.  If you think that the real world is gathering lots of feedback, making mistakes, listening to that feedback, and then producing a magnificent road, bridge, or transportation system, then collaborate with your team and change the world, and lock the door on anyone who screams at you that in the real world, you have to do it right the first time.

Purchase Dr. Reeves’ newest books on grading here: Elements of Grading, FAST Grading 

Subscribe to receive our blog updates

 

Related Posts

  • Using Text Annotation to Support the Writing Process

    April 29, 2026
    Contributing author: Dr. Marisa Rivas

    Read More

  • Is It Really Alternative—or Just a Different Address?

    In my work supporting alternative schools and programs, I’ve found that too often continuation and alternative settings inherit the same graduation requirements, schedules, grading systems, instructional routines, and pacing that failed students the first time. They are simply in a smaller setting and frequently with even fewer resources. In many cases, rigid credit requirements minimize flexibility for students and instead condemn them to hours of tedious, computer-based credit recovery.

    Read More

  • A Team of One: Rethinking Singletons in Collaborative Learning Teams

    It’s one of the most common, and most limiting, statements we hear when it comes to PLCs, or what we call Collaborative Learning Teams (CLTs). Whether it’s a lone 5th grade teacher, a single PE teacher, a music teacher, the only Chemistry teacher, a specialist, or someone teaching across multiple grade levels, the conclusion is often the same: there’s no one to collaborate with. And just like that, the work stops, not because it can’t happen, but because we’ve defined collaboration too narrowly.

    Read More