Desirable Difficulties

Dear Friends,

This week’s evidence comes from a new (April 24, 2024) study by Professor Onan Erdem and colleagues on the subject of “desirable difficulties.”  

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41539-024-00245-7

The authors found, not surprisingly, that students do not always seek out the path of challenge, what the Greeks called the Scholar’s Bench on the hill, but rather the value of indolence. I’m often the same way, so I can’t get very judgmental about students who prefer pleasure over pain. While students know that “desirable difficulty” is the optimal way to study – see Pooja Argawal’s wonderful book “Powerful Teaching,” the vast majority of students resort to their comfort zone – re-reading, highlighting, and more re-reading, when the evidence says that desirable difficulty comes from self-quizzing and dealing with the challenges of not having the correct answers immediately at hand.  

 The question for teachers is how do we get students to take the path of resistance rather than ease? The authors recommend the “Study Smart” framework to encourage students to, before study begins, consider Knowledge, Beliefs, Commitment, and Planning. There is an apt analogy in electronic games, in which each successive round has slightly greater difficulty than the previous game. The difficulty is not so great that students give up, and not so easy that students become bored. 

One of the greatest enemies of choosing desirable difficulty is, as Nancy Frey noted in our book on student engagement, that teachers signal verbally and non-verbally only approval for the right answer. Students conclude that it is better to remain silent than to venture a wrong answer. For a fully engaged classroom, Frey conclude, it must be a safe place to make mistakes. That is the central argument of Fearless Classroomsmy latest book. I have never felt more passionate about a book because I see too many classrooms in which fear is pervasive. We will, as Erdnan and colleagues contend, only have students seek the optimal point of desirable difficulty if they feel psychological safety in doing so.

I can be reached at 781.710.9633 or douglas.reeves@creativeleadership.net, if you want to discuss this week’s research.

Best,

Doug

Related Posts

  • Research Wednesday | March 4, 2026

    Do Audiobooks Count as Reading?
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    While surveys indicate that more than 40% of U.S. adults think that listening to a book should not be regarded as genuine reading, Brian Bannon, Chief Librarian of the New York Public Library, disagrees in a November 23, 2025, article.  He notes that while print circulation in the library has remained flat over the past five years, audiobook demand is up 65%.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 25, 2026

    Hope for Cynics
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this inspiring book (Hope for Cynics: The Surprising Science of Human Goodness, 2025) by Stanford’s Jamil Zaki, there is a treasure trove of research that will help all of us who support educators and school leaders who are dealing with despair in the dark winter months and pervasive threats to our schools, students, and professional careers. Professor Zaki marshals research and keen observation to make these essential arguments.

    Read More
  • Research Wednesday | February 18, 2026

    A Balanced and Skeptical View of AI in Schools
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    In this thoughtful and evidence-rich article (February 12, 2026), the authors cite several randomized control trials (RCT) that provide mixed evidence on the use of AI in schools. My recent book, Education and the Ethics of AI, offers practical ways to avoid cheating – the principal concern of teachers – and use AI in an ethical and constructive way.  This new article notes that when students become dependent on AI, their performance actually decreases, especially when they practice with AI but are later tested without AI assistance. Moreover, while AI can assist with simple tasks, such as learning multiplication tables, it does not enhance students’ reasoning or creative thinking.

    Read More