Constructive Use of AI for Educational Planning

Dear Friends,

This week’s evidence is about how teachers can make constructive use of AI to cut the amount of time they spend on instructional planning. This includes such tasks as instructional outlines, slides, discussion questions, and differentiating instruction by simplifying complex topics. As I’ve written before, it’s far from perfect and will not replace teachers, but it changes the role of teacher from lesson plan creator to quality control expert. I do fear that hurried teachers will simply cut and paste, but that is no better than being spoon-fed by publisher lesson plans, a process that, in my observation, most teachers despise. As long as we remember that we are the master and Chat GPT is the service, it might work – here’s the full article:  https://www.edutopia.org/article/6-ways-chatgpt-save-teachers-time/.

I can be reached at 781.710.9633 or douglas.reeves@creativeleadership.net, if you want to discuss this week’s research.

Best,

Doug

Related Posts

  • Using Text Annotation to Support the Writing Process

    April 29, 2026
    Contributing author: Dr. Marisa Rivas

    Read More
  • Is It Really Alternative—or Just a Different Address?

    In my work supporting alternative schools and programs, I’ve found that too often continuation and alternative settings inherit the same graduation requirements, schedules, grading systems, instructional routines, and pacing that failed students the first time. They are simply in a smaller setting and frequently with even fewer resources. In many cases, rigid credit requirements minimize flexibility for students and instead condemn them to hours of tedious, computer-based credit recovery.

    Read More
  • A Team of One: Rethinking Singletons in Collaborative Learning Teams

    It’s one of the most common, and most limiting, statements we hear when it comes to PLCs, or what we call Collaborative Learning Teams (CLTs). Whether it’s a lone 5th grade teacher, a single PE teacher, a music teacher, the only Chemistry teacher, a specialist, or someone teaching across multiple grade levels, the conclusion is often the same: there’s no one to collaborate with. And just like that, the work stops, not because it can’t happen, but because we’ve defined collaboration too narrowly.

    Read More