Personalized Learning

Dear Friends,

This week’s evidence comes from our friends at Johns Hopkins University. Once again, I need to let the evidence get in the way of my preconceived notions. The study is about personalized learning. Well before COVID, this term has often been poorly defined and a buzzword for tech companies to have students spend more time in front of screens with adaptive tests than engaging in collaborative learning. This global meta-analysis focused on early reading and included students from five countries. It focused on using Personalized and Adaptive Learning (PAL). It found an effect size (the percentage of a standard deviation change in student scores) of .29. That’s less than the Hattie standard of .40 but still much stronger than many other interventions. 

I need to learn more about the details before making a full-throated endorsement of PAL, but given the ever-widening learning gaps since COVID, we need to be open to other interventions. Certainly, this is better than the continuing pervasive use of after-school and summer school programs in which the neediest students rarely participate. Here’s the link:

Exploring the impact of personalized and adaptive learning technologies on reading literacy: A global meta-analysis – ScienceDirect

Related Posts

  • Research Wednesday | April 8, 2026

    Uncomplicated Grading Reform
    Contributing author: Dr. Emily Freeland

    It is not surprising that in schools and districts, significant grading reform efforts often stall. Not because educators disagree with the need to reconsider current practices, but because the work becomes burdensome and overly complicated. Issues and disagreements arise when monitoring checklists multiply in length; reporting systems grow more complex, and fairness and accuracy give way to compliance.

    Read More

  • Research Wednesday | March 11, 2026

    The Key to Secondary School Success: Getting 9th Grade Right
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    Kaaron Andrews has studied the relationship between 9th-grade student performance, graduation, and subsequent post-secondary success.  She is the Director of the Center for High School Success. When they increase on-track 9th-grade rates, they are 3-4 times more likely to graduate from high school. It is the single strongest predictor of high school success – more than race, socioeconomic status, or even 8th-grade test scores. She contends that high schools are programmed for disconnection – disconnected from their peer group and from teachers who often have 150 students with whom they struggle to have a relationship.

    Read More

  • Research Wednesday | March 4, 2026

    Do Audiobooks Count as Reading?
    Contributing author: Dr. Douglas Reeves

    While surveys indicate that more than 40% of U.S. adults think that listening to a book should not be regarded as genuine reading, Brian Bannon, Chief Librarian of the New York Public Library, disagrees in a November 23, 2025, article.  He notes that while print circulation in the library has remained flat over the past five years, audiobook demand is up 65%.

    Read More